GO2EC.ORG
Site Map
About Us EC & Pharmacies State Information Legislation Media Center Resources Get Involved
Helping pharmacy & health communities improve access to Emergency Contraception (EC)
EC & Pharmacies
Why EC and Pharmacies?
Models for EC Pharmacies
States With Direct Access
Collaborative Practice Agreements
How Does Your State Compare?
Plan B OTC Application
International
Minors and Pharmacy Access
EC Timeline
Home > EC and Pharmacies > Minors and Pharmacy Access

Minors and Pharmacy Access

Pharmacy Access to EC for Minors (Printer Friendly PDF-68K)

FDA Decision on Plan B: Impact on Minors

On August 24, 2006 the FDA approved Plan B for nonprescription sale to consumers 18 and older in the United States. Women under 18 will still need a prescription. Women in states with EC pharmacy access programs may continue to get EC directly from pharmacies without going to the doctor/clinic first for a prescription. For more information click here.

Young Women’s Need for EC

Over one-third of young women become pregnant at least once before they reach the age of 20.1 About 80% of these 820,000 teenage pregnancies a year are unintended,2, 3 and a third of these end in abortion.4 Pharmacy access to emergency contraception (EC) can greatly reduce this public health challenge. However, EC use by minors has often been cited as an argument to prohibit easier access to EC. In May 2004, the FDA rejected an application to make Plan B, a dedicated EC product, over-the-counter (OTC) citing concerns that there was not enough data to support that young teens could safely use the product. The following month, the governor of New Hampshire vetoed a bill to permit pharmacists to directly dispense EC, espousing concerns of irresponsible sexual behavior and a lack of parental involvement. Currently, the FDA is considering a proposal by Barr Laboratories, Inc., the owner of Plan B, to offer dual access to the product – over-the-counter for women 16 and older, and prescription for women younger than 16 years old.

Access to EC should not be any different for teens.

  • There is no medical or public health reason for limiting access to EC for adolescents. When Plan B was approved for prescription sale in 1999, the FDA did not impose any age restrictions. In 2004, 22 of the 28 FDA Advisory Committee experts reviewing the application to make Plan B OTC recommended not placing any limitations, age related or otherwise, on access to Plan B.5

EC does not encourage promiscuity and sexual irresponsibility.

  • Knowledge about contraception delays sexual activity among adolescents and increases contraceptive use among sexually active youth.6
  • Research has demonstrated that there are no negative behavioral or health ramifications to making EC more readily available. A study of women ages 15-20 showed that advance provision of EC did not increase unprotected sex or reduce condom use.7 A UCSF study of young women showed that women with easier access to EC are not more likely to miss a pill, switch birth control methods, or forgo using a condom than women obtaining EC through a clinic. Frequency of intercourse, amount of unprotected sex, and the number of sexual partners were also similar among the study groups.8  
  • Even among women and teens who use a method consistently, accidents happen.

Pharmacy access to EC will not increase exposure to STIs.

  • Easier access to EC is not associated with increased STIs or pregnancy among young women. A UCSF study showed that young women obtaining EC through pharmacy access are no more likely to get an STI.8
  • Women, regardless of age, are able to understand that EC does not protect against STIs or HIV. The FDA Advisory Committee that reviewed the Plan B OTC application agreed that the product’s labeling is clear and comprehensible for women — regardless of age — to understand that it does not protect against STIs or HIV.9
  • Women who have chosen hormonal methods for protection against unintended pregnancy remain at risk for STIs. They may feel more confident relying on condoms for birth control if EC was easily available as a back up if the condom breaks.

Pharmacy access to EC offers an opportunity for providers to educate and/or get women into care.

  • For sexually active youth, EC provides an opportunity to learn about effective long term birth control methods and disease prevention. Studies show that a request for EC may lead to initiation of routine gynecological care, including counseling about sexual behaviors and prevention strategies.10
  • EC pharmacists in states that provide pharmacy access to EC obtain special training that covers the pharmacology of EC, counseling issues, and the delivery of services to minors.
  • Health care providers can and should still counsel their patients about sexual behavior and prevention strategies.
  • Teens rarely seek counseling from a health care provider prior to having sex for the first time because most teens don’t plan their first sexual experience.11

Increasing EC access does not send a mixed message on abstinence to teens.

  • The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy found that most adults (68%) and teens (77%) think making EC more widely available is consistent with strong messages to teens that abstinence is their best option to prevent pregnancy.12
  • Research has shown that both a decrease in sexual activity and an increase in contraceptive use have driven down rates of teen pregnancy over the last decade.13, 14

Pharmacy access to EC offers other public health benefits.

  • Pharmacy access to EC will reduce unintended pregnancy, which will save the state money. Pregnant teens are less likely to access prenatal care early, are more likely to experience pregnancy-related problems, and are more likely to have sick infants. Teen pregnancies cost the United States at least $7 billion annually.15
  • Teen pregnancies also create societal costs. A report on the costs of adolescent childbearing showed that only one-third of teen mothers receive a high school diploma16 and calculations by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy indicated that nearly 80 percent of unmarried teen mothers end up on welfare.17 The children of teenage mothers are more likely to perform poorly in school16 and are at greater risk of abuse and neglect.18
  • Even if a state has an overall low teen pregnancy rate, it may have regions with high rates where improved access to EC can reduce teen pregnancy.

Teens can have confidential access to EC at pharmacies.

  • Limiting adolescents from receiving confidential reproductive healthcare services produces significant and harmful health repercussions. In instances where private insurance is used to cover the product, a separate patient profile for EC patients can be established to protect confidentiality, mitigating concerns that teens may forgo obtaining EC.
  • An increasing number of pharmacies are offering consultation rooms to provide a confidential location to conduct the EC assessment.

A very special thank you to Reproductive Health Technologies Project and Population Services International who developed materials that served as valuable resources for this document.

Additional Resources

Sources

1. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy (2004). “How is the 34% statistic calculated?”  Washington, DC.

2. Henshaw SK (2003). “U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics with Comparative Statistics for Women Aged 20-24.” New York, NY: The Alan Guttmacher Institute

3. Henshaw, SK (1998). “Unintended Pregnancy in the United States.” Family Planning Perspectives, 30(1): 24-29, 46. Based on data from the 1982, 1988, and 1995 cycles of the National Survey of Family Growth, supplemented by data from other sources

4. Alan Guttmacher Institute (2004). “U.S. Teenage Pregnancy Statistics: Overall Trends, Trends by Race and Ethnicity and State-by-State Information.” New York, NY.

5. Food and Drug Administration Release (2003). “Barr Plan B Emergency Contraceptive OTC CARE Program Adequate, Cmte. Says.”  Online at: www.fdaadvisorycommittee.com.

6. Kirby D (1997). “An impact evaluation of project SNAPP: an AIDS and pregnancy prevention middle school program.” AIDS Educ Prev, 9(1 Suppl): 44-61.

7. Gold MA (2004). “The effects of advanced provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women’s sexual and contraceptive behaviors.” Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 17(2): 87-96.

8. Raine TR et al. (2005). “Direct Access to Emergency Contraception Through Pharmacies and Effect on Unintended Pregnancy and STIs.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 293 (1): 54-62.

9. FDA, Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs (2003). “Briefing Information.” Online at www.fda.gov.

10. Stewart HE, Gold MA, Parker AM (2003). “The impact of using emergency contraception on reproductive health outcomes: A retrospective review in an urban adolescent clinic.” Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology, 16: 313-8.

11. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy Website. Online: www.teenpregnancy.org.

12. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy (2003). “With one voice: America's adults and teens sound off about teen pregnancy.” Washington DC

13. Darroch JE, Singh S (1999). “Why Is Teenage Pregnancy Declining? The Roles of Abstinence, Sexual Activity, and Contraceptive Use.” Occasional Report, No. 1. New York, NY: The Alan Guttmacher Institute.

14. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy (2001). Halfway There: A Prescription for Continued Progress in Preventing Teen Pregnancy. Washington DC

15. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy (1997). Whatever Happened to Childhood? The Problem of Teen Pregnancy in the United States. Washington DC

16. Maynard RA (Ed.) (1996). Kids Having Kids: A Robin Hood Foundation Special Report on the Costs of Adolescent Childbearing. New York, NY: Robin Hood Foundation

17. Calculations based on the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (1979-1985) in Congressional Budget Office. (1990, September). Sources of Support for Adolescent Mothers. Washington DC. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy

18. George RM, Lee BJ (1997). Abuse and Neglect of Children. In R.A. Maynard (Ed.), Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy (pp. 205-230). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press

Back to top

About UsEC & PharmaciesState ProfilesLegislationResourcesGet InvolvedHomeSite Map

© 2008 Pharmacy Access Partnership